In Six Days Why fifty scientists choose to believe in creation


edited by John F. Ashton, Ph.D.

bk-sixdays-frntWhy would any educated, self-respecting scientist with a PhD advocate a literal interpretation of the six days of creation? Why, indeed, when only one in three Americans believes “the Bible is the actual word of God and is to be taken literally, word for word” according to a recent Gallop poll.

Science can neither prove nor disprove evolution anymore than it can creation. Certainly there are no human eyewitness accounts of either. However, certain factors are present today which are capable of swaying one’s beliefs one way or the other.

In this book are the testimonies of fifty men and women holding doctorates in a wide range of scientific fields who have been convinced by the evidence to believe in a literal six-day creation. For example, meet:

  • The geneticist who concludes that there must have been 150 billion forerunners of “modern man” in order for the natural selection required by evolution to have taken place in the development of man. The evidence for such vast numbers of “prehistoric man” is in dire shortage.
  • The orthodontist who discovered that European museum fossils of ancient man have been tampered with to adhere to evolution theories.
  • The geologist who studied under Stephen Jay Gould and literally cut the Bible to pieces before totally rejecting evolution.

All fifty of these scientists, through faith and scientific fact, have come to the conclusion that God’s Word is true and everything had its origin not so very long ago, in the beginning, In Six Days. Source link

About these ads


Categories: Discussion

Tags: , , , , , , ,

1 reply

  1. Project Steve. That is all.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 974 other followers

%d bloggers like this: